I am old enough to remember when Honey Smacks cereal was called Sugar Smacks. So it’s no surprise to me that a serving of the cereal has more sugar than a Twinkie.
Honey Nut Cheerios though? I was annoyed when I learned from a new report by the Environmental Working Group that the cereal I used to feed my picky eater for breakfast has more sugar per cup than three Chips Ahoy cookies (see static.ewg.org/reports/2011/cereals/pdf/2011-EWG-Cereals-Report.pdf).
If I wanted to feed my kids cookies for breakfast, I’d just get them Sprinkle Cookie Crisp “cereal,” which, along with a long list of other cereals either marketed at kids or clearly made for kids, has an awful lot of sugar in it.
In fact, says the report, 56 children’s cereals contain more than 24-26% sugar by weight. The grand champion of them all, Honey (nee Sugar) Smacks, is nearly 56% sugar by weight.
The problem for cereal makers is that they’re reaching the point where removing any more sugar makes their cereals too yucky to eat. The Wall Street Journal reported this fall that cereal companies have been quietly lowering sugar levels, hoping to teach “consumers to get used to a lower sweetness level a little at a time.” But there’s a point where kids just won’t want to eat them anymore.
Yet parents want healthier (or at least, deemed healthier by a government agency or clever marketing) food selections for their kids. Maybe some parents actually deluded themselves into thinking Froot Loops really were part of a nutritious breakfast back in 2009, when the Smart Choices food labeling system set out to help shoppers choose foods that meet nutritional criteria set by the Dietary Guidelines for America.
The LA Times reported back then that even Lucky Charms got the Smart Choices seal of approval. Yet Lucky Charms, the colorful marshmallow-laden cereal, has 30% of the total amount of added sugar recommended by the USDA for adults.
So what’s the answer? Don’t buy sugary cereals. Your kids will get used to less sugar – even the cereal makers say so. Feed them an actual “nutritious breakfast,” not a bowl of mostly sugar, a glass of OJ, some milk and white toast with a slab of butter, like parents who were kids in the ’70s and ’80s were raised to believe was the way to go.
Posted in: Health & Nutrition
Comment Policy: All viewpoints are welcome, but comments should remain relevant. Personal attacks, profanity, and aggressive behavior are not allowed. No spam, advertising, or promoting of products/services. Please, only use your real name and limit the amount of links submitted in your comment.
You Might Also Like...
Dr. Bill Harden: A Life’s Investment In His Daughters
Working on six continents? Raising killer bees? Becoming a family physician at 35? All of these could give Dr. Bill Harden a reason to boast, but there is something far […]
The Troubled Tummy: Deciphering Your Child’s Chronic Digestive Distress
The dinner scene is dishearteningly familiar. Your 8-year-old daughter takes a couple bites of spaghetti, then starts poking at the food on her plate. “Eat up!” you say brightly, hoping […]
Fun Ways Nature Helps Reduce Stress
Our kids are living with a lot of stress these days, including the uncertainty of schooling amid the pandemic, and navigating social media, along with the “normal” stressors of growing […]
Building Relationship Resilience
Being married with kids in the modern age is the perfect recipe for the occasional — or constant — experience of chaos and feeling overwhelmed. The challenge starts with marriage. […]
